Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pavle Cajic's avatar

Hi Paul, a bit late to this interesting post but looking back at it a question for you just popped into my mind! I have heard some physicists argue that there is no 'disagreement' between the QFT calculation of the dark energy and the observed value. This is because (as I understand) there is always a freedom to add a constant to the zero-point energy without affecting any other aspects of the QFT, as only energy differences are relevant here. Hence, QFT doesn't give a specific prediction for the dark energy, at best you might argue it gives a 'contribution to the dark energy from vaccuum fluctuations'. In GR, we also have a free constant (the cosmological constant) which successfully models the dark energy. Since this constant can't be calculated, it can be treated as a free parameter taken from measurement. These phycisists therefore argue that the dark energy 'problem' is no different to the problem of the specific value of the electron mass, for instance (it's a parameter that is measured), and that the 'origin' of dark energy is no mystery; it's a natural parameter in GR (the origin of its value, of course, is a mystery). And while QFT may provide a possible mechanism that would contribute to the dark energy, there's no reason a priori to think that the vaccuum energy from QFT is *equal* to the dark energy. Indeed, if this were a genuine prediction from QFT, why wasn't the QFT falsified by the awful discrepancy? I am curious to hear your stance!

Expand full comment
Bill Gye's avatar

Another great article carefully translating such an important scientific question into everyday concepts. My question would be .. could quantum theory be tweaked so that the vacuum energy calculation equals the dark energy calculation?

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts